Anonymous marking and moderation - how to do it?

Olly.Fayers41

Hi everyone.

 

At my institution, we have recently implemented anonymous marking. We are now struggling with how a moderation process would work. Traditionally, the first marker would provide the feedback in the annotations tool, and in the feedback box as usual. The second marker (moderator) would then add a comment in the Grades tool, where the comment can be private, to indicate that they were happy with the judgment. An external examiner would then review the feedback and this comment.

 

However, because we now use anonymous marking, that process can't take place unless the grades are first published (and therefore de-anonymised). Does anybody know how we might best handle this workflow so that all markers will see anonymised work?

 

Thanks!